…Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature.”…
AND WHAT DOES THE EARTH FEEL LIKE TO YOU? DO YOU STILL TRUST YOUR OBSERVATION AND YOUR INSTINCT? THEY ARE DELIBERATELY BREEDING THIS OUT OF US SO THAT WE MUST ALWAYS ASK THEM LIARS AND CHEATERS FOR THE ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS, AND AS A RESULT, THEY CAN FURTHER DECEIVE US TO THEIR BENEFIT. WHAT WE THINK ARE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, ARE ACTUALLY PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS, RUN BY CRIMINALS. WE HAVE NO MONEY, YET PRES. TRUMP ASSIGNS BILLIONS MORE TO THIS CROOKED COMPANY, NASA, GETTING US MORE INDEBTED UNTIL THE JEWS FINALLY WILL TAKE OUR WHOLE COUNTRY AWAY, THE COLLATERAL FOR THE MONEY WE OWE THEM, WHICH I AM SURE THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO.
THEY STOLE BILLIONS FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR THEIR PHONY SPACE PROGRAM TO INDEBT THEM EVEN MORE. SO SOON THEY WILL COLLECT THEIR COLLATERAL THAT IS YOUR LAND, YOUR HOME, AND YOUR BANK ACCOUNT FOR OUR INABILITY TO EVEN PAY THE INTEREST ALONE. THAT’S DONE VIA A BIG CRASH!!!
From “200 proofs Earth is not a Spinning Ball”
by Eric Dubay.
[Admin: In the Early days, Eric Dubay believed in the evil German scientists of Paperclip, which I think is reflected in this book, and very much offended me. But he has now learned the truth and is a great supporter of Adolf Hitler, et al. Eric Dubay provides a few of his books for free on his website http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/ and encourages people to share his information freely.]
Via email from Skip (taken from the above book):
1) “The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.”
2) “The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.”
3) “The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.”
4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course, North, South, East, West and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico.”
5) “One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.”
6) “If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level.”
7) Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature.”
8) The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles.”
9) Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this – that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”
10) “The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool.”
11) A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated, “I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL. The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible.”
12) The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in the Earth Review stated, “It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth.”
13) “In a 19th century French experiment by M. M. Biot and Arago a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on the summit of Desierto las Palmas in Spain and able to be seen all the way from Camprey on the Island of Iviza. Since the elevation of the two points were identical and the distance between covered nearly 100 miles, if Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the light should have been more than 6600 feet, a mile and a quarter, below the line of sight!”
14) “The Lieutenant-Colonel Portlock experiment used oxy-hydrogen Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the sun’s rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St. George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Portlock’s light should have remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature.”
15) “If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.”
16) “The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct.”
17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model.”
18) “The Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to Earth’s assumed motion through space. After measuring in every possible different direction in various locations they failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again proving the stationary geocentric model.”
19) “Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved around the Sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190,000,000 miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.”
20) “If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, vertically-fired cannonballs and other projectiles should fall significantly due west. In actual fact, however, whenever this has been tested, vertically-fired cannonballs shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the ground no more than 2 feet away from the cannon, often directly back into the muzzle.”
Here I have given you only 20 of the 200 profs that the Earth is not a Globe, as you have been presented with since the first day you attended First Grade, and I have left out the photographs and drawings, to save space in this email since I am sending it out on my wife’s Hot-Spot, that is connected to her Cell Phone account. We are taking care of her 90 year old mother who has had several falls over the last week, and is now bedfast, so I can’t get to my Router at home. If you would like to have a pdf copy of Eric Dubay’s book: “200 proofs the Earth is not a spinning ball” including the photos and drawings, let me know, and I will send you the PDF that Theresa has so kindly sent to me, the next time I can get to the Library in Montross or Warsaw. Your friends won’t be laughing at you for saying the Earth they read this book.
The Spinning Ball Earth was invented by the Jesuits (Crypto-Jews in the Catholic Church), to destroy faith in the bible, since demon seed Jews from Edom/Idumea, didn’t write a WORD of the bible, except for the book of Esther, that shouldn’t be in our Saxon Bibles at all, since it WAS written by demon seed Jews and mentions “God” nowhere. After buying up all the bible publishing companies, the Jews removed 14 books to hide the fact that they are demon seed, pretending to be the White Hebrew True Israelite Race, and that we Whites are the “Real Lost 13 Tribes” who are the sons of the Man called Jacob, that were all born on a different month, and had his name changed to “Israel” by Yahweh the Almighty. Yahweh is about to “punish the world” for what we helped the Communist Jews do to the real Tribe of Judah (Christian Germany) in WWII. So stock up on food and supplies, and move to the country at once.
P.S. (Skip): The interesting thing is, that Eric Dubay realized that the Jews are the enemy, after he learned the FACTS about the Flat Earth, since they started the entire LIE! In 1969 my roommate “worked” at Com-Sat, the Communication Satellite Corporation in Washington D.C., as Personnel Director, and “Director” of two other departments. They told him to come in once a month to get his three paychecks, so we spent the summer on his house boat on the Potomac River, in one long party with 4 other boat owners, that lasted the summer of 1969. I should have known then that there was a problem with this “whole NASA Satellite situation” way back then! I hate to tell you this, but there are no “Satellites” and they use high altitude balloons and cell towers to do all that.